Ingezonden

Harassing a cyclist is opposite a law in Berkley, CA among other cities in a US (© boogieelephant – Fotolia.com)

If usually there was a
law opposite such things.
It’s matter many a cyclist has spoken after
facing an careless driver. There ought to be a law opposite honking a horn,
yelling obscenities during riders or misfortune of all pushing tighten as in “buzzing” a
cyclist, and now in Berkeley, California an anti-harassment bidding is on the
books.

This news follows 2011’s efforts in Los Angeles, where L.A.
City Councilman Bill Rosendahl introduced groundbreaking anti-harassment
ordinance for bicyclists, that was a initial of a kind in a United States.
The bidding creates it a crime for drivers to bluster cyclists verbally or physically,
and allows victims of nuisance to sue in polite justice though watchful for the
city to press rapist charges.

Inspired by Rosendahl’s success, Berkley City Councilman
Kriss Worthington, who is described as an zealous cyclist, introduced a similar
measure in a Bay Area community. He told BikeRadar that internal riders came to
him with stories of nuisance while riding, and they wanted to see what could
be done. “The district profession and a military are unequivocally bustling with serious
issues, and this could give people another approach of doing these situations,”
said Worthington, who combined that he had formerly listened about a Los Angeles
ordinance.

“One of a people who helped pierce this to a city council
had lived in Los Angeles and understands because L.A. introduced a ordinance,” added
Worthington. “He was means to pronounce to a legislature and swayed them that it
was something critical to consider.”

What grew out of a censure from cyclists has turn something
that internal riders see as a pierce in a right direction. Even if a law isn’t
itself simply enforceable, recognition is a key, contend riders. “I do know there is a flourishing regulatory trend
intended to quell engineer nuisance of bicyclists,” pronounced Ian Moore,
transportation planner with a Berkeley Bicycle Club. He told BikeRadar that he believes this “is an
interesting idea, though we privately trust that a compulsory open education
to lift recognition of such laws is some-more critical component than a law itself.”

Many trust a new bidding will pierce about improved preparation in regards to cyclists’ rights to a road

This opinion is also uttered by Jim Brown, communications
director of a California Bicycle Coalition who remarkable that Berkeley
essentially adopted denunciation that is matching to that adopted by Los Angeles. “It
gives bicyclists a apparatus that they haven’t had before,” pronounced Brown. “It is
hardly a sorcery bullet to keep drivers who bluster people to stop them from
doing so, though it still gives bicyclists a apparatus for when those events do occur.”

Brown adds that this is only one
way to put incidents that simply shouldn’t occur on people’s radar.

And that is a idea of march Worthington; to pierce these
situations out in a open so that maybe they don’t continue and when they do
to give energy behind to those who have been harassed. “It seems like it could give
riders a collection to residence this themselves,” he said

You can follow BikeRadar on Twitter during twitter.com/bikeradar and on Facebook during facebook.com/BikeRadar.

Bron: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/BikeRadar/feeds/~3/H3x0RI8tei8/story01.htm